CasinoNewsDaily

Bitcoin Apparent Demand Flatlines in Negative Territory for 208 Days as Sell Pressure Mounts

TL;DR

CryptoQuant-linked data shows Bitcoin apparent demand remaining negative for 208 consecutive days.
The metric reportedly stands around -273,000 BTC, signaling weak new buyer inflows.
The bearish demand reading contrasts with Bitcoin’s continued defense of key support zones.

Negative On-Chain Demand Versus Price Support: Why This Story Matters

Bitcoin Apparent Demand Flatlines in Negative Territory for 208 Days as Sell Pressure Mounts has become one of the stronger weekend crypto stories because it sits at the intersection of price action, market structure, and the kind of narrative that traders tend to follow closely when the broader news cycle slows down.

The key point is not simply that bitcoin apparent demand has remained negative for 208 consecutive days. It is that the development gives the market a fresh way to judge whether the current crypto environment is being driven by genuine network adoption, regulatory progress, liquidity shifts, or short-term speculation.

The Main Details

According to available market and on-chain data, Bitcoin apparent demand has remained negative for 208 consecutive days. The report also notes that the reported reading is around -273,000 BTC.

That distinction matters because crypto markets often move first on headlines and only later separate durable developments from short-lived momentum. In this case, the verified boundaries are especially important: Do not treat the metric as an automatic price crash signal.

Market Context

For traders, the story arrives at a moment when crypto assets are still trying to define a clearer direction. Bitcoin remains the anchor for broader sentiment, but altcoin narratives are increasingly being judged on their own fundamentals, including usage, liquidity, compliance, treasury activity, and developer progress.

That makes this development relevant beyond a single token or company. If the underlying trend proves durable, it could help shape how investors evaluate Bitcoin, BTC, CryptoQuant, On-chain, Demand over the coming weeks. If it fades, however, it may become another example of a strong weekend narrative that struggled to translate into sustained market follow-through.

What To Watch Next

The next important question is whether the market receives further confirmation from primary sources, dashboards, official announcements, or on-chain data. Follow-up disclosures, exchange data, governance updates, or wallet activity could all help clarify whether this is an isolated headline or the start of a broader theme.

Readers should also watch whether liquidity responds. In crypto, even fundamentally meaningful developments can fail to move prices if traders remain defensive, leverage is being unwound, or capital is rotating into other sectors. That is why this story should be read alongside broader market structure rather than in isolation.

This report is based on information from CryptoQuant.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/TbNUP9t

Bitcoin Slides Toward $58,000 As ETF Outflows And Options Expiry Add Pressure

Bitcoin’s latest pullback was not driven by a single headline. Instead, traders were hit by a cluster of pressure points at the same time: weakness in global technology stocks, another heavy day of spot Bitcoin ETF redemptions, a sharp leverage flush, and a large monthly options expiry that kept the market focused on downside strike levels.

TL;DR

Bitcoin fell toward the $58,000 area as risk appetite weakened across crypto and technology stocks.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw roughly $691.7 million to $696 million in net outflows on June 25, extending a six-day redemption streak.
A large Deribit monthly options expiry, valued around $10 billion, added another layer of uncertainty for traders.
Liquidations across the crypto market topped $1 billion over a 24-hour window as leverage was forced out of the system.

ETF Outflows Add To The Pressure

The institutional flow picture turned sharply negative before the move. Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States recorded net redemptions of roughly $691.7 million to $696 million on June 25, according to the validated figures in the writing pack. Fidelity’s FBTC and BlackRock’s IBIT were among the largest contributors to the daily outflow, with FBTC cited at about $274.5 million and IBIT at about $265.7 million.

That matters because spot ETFs have become one of the clearest gauges of institutional demand for Bitcoin. One weak day does not define a full trend, but a six-day redemption streak changes the market’s tone. When price is already under pressure and ETF flows continue to move out, traders tend to question whether dip-buying demand is deep enough to absorb forced selling and hedging activity.

Derivatives Traders Focus On The $55,000 To $60,000 Zone

The timing of the decline was also awkward for derivatives traders. Bitcoin moved into the $58,000 region around the same time as a major monthly options expiry on Deribit, with notional value cited at roughly $10 billion. Options expiries do not mechanically determine price direction, but they can concentrate hedging flows around key strike levels and make already-volatile markets more difficult to read.

The validated source pack also pointed to stronger put skew around the $55,000 to $60,000 area. In plain English, traders were paying more attention to downside protection as Bitcoin tested lower levels. That does not guarantee a deeper drop, but it shows where anxiety had built up across the options market.

Leverage Gets Washed Out

Liquidation data added to the bearish picture. Across the broader crypto market, more than $1 billion in leveraged positions were reportedly liquidated within a 24-hour window. Forced liquidations can accelerate intraday moves because losing positions are closed automatically, often into already-thin liquidity.

The broader backdrop was not helping either. Crypto’s sell-off came alongside pressure in global technology shares, including weakness in Nasdaq futures and heavy selling in parts of Asia’s equity market. That link matters because Bitcoin and major altcoins have increasingly traded like high-beta risk assets during periods when investors reduce exposure to expensive growth and technology themes.

What Traders Are Watching Now

The immediate question is whether ETF outflows cool, whether options-related pressure fades after expiry, and whether Bitcoin can hold the lower end of the recent trading range. A reclaim of higher levels would help stabilize sentiment, but a failure to absorb redemptions and leverage unwinds could keep downside protection in focus.

For now, the sell-off looks less like a crypto-specific breakdown and more like a broad risk-off move amplified by ETF flows and derivatives positioning. That distinction matters: if macro pressure eases, the market may stabilize quickly. If institutional redemptions continue, however, the path back above key levels could remain choppy.

This report is based on information from CoinDesk Markets and Tokenpost and CoinDesk Derivatives.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/PpVB0v3

Tether Briefly Overtakes Ethereum As Stablecoin Market Cap Tops ETH During Sell-Off

Tether briefly overtook Ethereum by market capitalization on June 26, according to the validated discovery pack, as ETH sold off into the $1,500 to $1,600 range and stablecoin supply remained comparatively steady. The crossover was temporary, but the symbolism was hard to ignore: during one of the market’s sharpest risk-off sessions, crypto’s largest stablecoin briefly moved ahead of Ethereum.

TL;DR

Tether briefly flipped Ethereum by market capitalization during the June 26 sell-off.
USDT’s market cap was cited around $186.06 billion, while ETH fell near $185.66 billion during the intraday crossover.
Ethereum later recovered above the level, so the flip should not be framed as permanent.
The move highlights how stablecoin dominance can rise when investors reduce risk exposure.

A Temporary Flip, But A Loud Signal

The validated figures showed Tether’s market capitalization reaching roughly $186.06 billion while Ethereum’s market value fell to around $185.66 billion during the brief crossover. Ethereum later recovered above the mark, meaning the event should be treated as an intraday milestone rather than a permanent reshuffling of the crypto rankings.

Still, the moment was notable because Ethereum has long held the second-largest market capitalization in crypto behind Bitcoin. Stablecoins are not typically viewed in the same way as productive or programmable blockchain networks, but in market capitalization tables they compete for the same ranking space. When USDT briefly moved ahead, it reflected both Ethereum’s drawdown and the scale of stablecoin liquidity sitting on the sidelines.

Why Stablecoin Dominance Matters

Stablecoin market capitalization tends to be watched as a proxy for liquidity inside the digital asset ecosystem. A rising stablecoin supply can suggest that capital remains within crypto rails, even if it is not actively allocated to volatile assets. During sell-offs, traders often move into USDT or other stablecoins to reduce exposure without fully exiting exchanges or on-chain environments.

That is why the Tether-Ethereum crossover is best understood as a risk-aversion signal. It does not mean Ethereum’s long-term role has changed, nor does it mean the market has permanently favored stablecoins over smart-contract networks. But it does show how quickly rankings can shift when a major asset sells off and the market’s defensive liquidity base remains large.

Ethereum’s Weakness Meets USDT’s Scale

Ethereum’s market capitalization is highly sensitive to spot price because ETH trades freely and can move sharply during high-volatility sessions. Tether’s market capitalization, by contrast, largely reflects circulating supply. That makes USDT less volatile in market-cap terms, especially during a session when traders are seeking shelter rather than chasing risk.

The brief flip therefore says as much about Ethereum’s price decline as it does about Tether’s scale. ETH moving into the $1,500 to $1,600 region placed its total valuation close enough for USDT to pass it, even if only briefly. For traders, the crossover offered a simple visual snapshot of the day’s market mood: defensive assets were holding their ground while major altcoins were being repriced.

What Comes Next

The key question is whether Ethereum can quickly rebuild distance above Tether in the rankings. A strong ETH rebound would likely turn the event into a short-lived curiosity. A prolonged period of weak ETH price action, however, could keep stablecoin dominance in focus and raise more questions about capital rotation within crypto.

For now, the safer framing is that Tether’s brief move above Ethereum was a symbolic market stress signal, not a permanent change in crypto’s hierarchy. It showed that stablecoin liquidity remains enormous, and that in sharp sell-offs, even Ethereum’s long-held second-place position can temporarily come under pressure.

This report is based on information from The Currency Analytics.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/n1ySbRi

XRP Tests $1 Support As Long Liquidations Surge Inside Multi-Month Wedge

XRP’s latest sell-off has put the $1 level back at the center of market attention, with traders watching whether the token can hold psychological support while derivatives data shows a sharp flush in long positions. The move comes as XRP continues to trade inside a broader multi-month falling wedge structure, keeping both technical traders and leveraged participants on edge.

TL;DR

XRP tested the psychological $1 support level during the June 26 sell-off.
Daily charts show XRP trading inside a multi-month falling wedge pattern.
Long liquidations reportedly reached $40.73 million on June 25, the highest single-day figure since early February 2026.
Analysts are watching the $1.10 to $1.12 area as a potential short-term momentum reclaim zone, while lower monthly support sits near $0.91.

The $1 Level Takes Center Stage

Round-number levels often matter in crypto because they become easy reference points for both retail traders and automated strategies. For XRP, the $1 area is especially important because it has served as a psychological dividing line between deeper bearish momentum and attempts at stabilization.

The validated pack shows XRP testing that level on June 26 as sell-side pressure accelerated. However, the writing boundaries are important: $1 should not be described as a guaranteed floor. The same validation notes point to longer-term monthly support lower, around $0.91, meaning a break of the psychological level could still leave the market searching for a more durable base.

Liquidations Add Fuel To The Decline

The move was not just about spot selling. XRP long liquidations reportedly reached $40.73 million on June 25, marking the highest single-day liquidation volume since early February 2026. More than 97% of XRP long positions were wiped out in the 24-hour period leading into June 26, according to the validated derivatives data.

That matters because liquidation-heavy declines can move faster than ordinary spot corrections. When leveraged longs are forced out, exchanges automatically close losing positions, which can amplify downside moves and push price into key levels faster than discretionary traders expect.

Falling Wedge Keeps Traders Watching For A Reclaim

Technically, XRP remains inside a multi-month falling wedge pattern. Traders often watch wedge structures for signs of compression and potential reversal, but the pattern does not guarantee a breakout. In the current setup, the validated pack notes that reclaiming the $1.10 to $1.12 region would be needed to shift short-term momentum more constructively.

Until that happens, the market remains vulnerable to failed bounces. XRP can stabilize near $1, but bulls need to prove that the move is more than a temporary pause after leverage was flushed out. A clean move back above the reclaim zone would likely be watched as a first sign that the sell-off is losing force.

What XRP Bulls Need To Avoid

The main danger for bulls is a decisive loss of $1 followed by weak demand on any retest. If that happens, traders may shift focus toward the lower monthly support area near $0.91. That does not mean XRP must trade there, but it gives the market a clear downside reference if psychological support fails.

For now, XRP is caught between two competing signals: a technical structure that some traders may view as a potential reversal setup, and liquidation data showing that leveraged bullish positioning has already been punished heavily. The next test is whether spot demand can replace the leverage that just left the market.

This report is based on information from Crypto.news XRP Wedge and BeInCrypto XRP Support.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/jPGCN6x

DeFi Total Value Locked Plunges 39% In 2026 As Yields Cool Down

Decentralized finance is going through a reset after another stretch of shrinking liquidity. Aggregate DeFi total value locked has reportedly fallen sharply in 2026, pulling the sector back toward levels that reflect cooler yields, lower risk appetite, and a less forgiving market backdrop.

TL;DR

DeFi TVL has reportedly fallen around 39% in 2026, bottoming near $70 billion.
The drawdown reflects weaker token prices, lower speculative yield demand, and a broader risk-off rotation.
The reset may leave healthier protocols in a stronger position, but it also shows how fragile leverage-heavy DeFi activity can be.

A Liquidity Reset Across DeFi

The headline number is stark: DeFi TVL has reportedly dropped 39% this year, with aggregate value falling toward the $70 billion area. TVL is not a perfect measure of DeFi health because it moves with token prices as well as user deposits, but a sustained decline still tells a useful story. Less collateral is sitting inside protocols, fewer users are chasing complex yield loops, and market participants are being more selective about risk.

That is a very different environment from the periods when high token incentives and aggressive leverage made almost every new yield opportunity feel attractive. When prices fall and yields compress, users tend to unwind positions quickly. That creates a feedback loop where lower asset values reduce collateral, falling collateral reduces borrowing power, and lower borrowing power pulls more liquidity out of the system.

Exploits And Leverage Remain Pressure Points

Security risk is another part of the story. Even when headline DeFi yields look attractive, repeated exploits and smart-contract failures remind users that nominal returns are not the same as risk-adjusted returns. A single bridge exploit, oracle failure, or vault issue can erase months of yield in minutes. That makes capital more cautious, especially when safer crypto-native yields are also available through stablecoins, tokenized Treasuries, or centralized exchange products.

The leverage side is just as important. During hotter markets, recursive borrowing and yield loops can inflate TVL by moving the same capital through several protocols. When risk appetite fades, those loops unwind. That means the decline in TVL can look dramatic, but it may also represent the system shedding artificial or circular liquidity rather than losing only long-term committed users.

Why The Reset Still Matters

For traders, a shrinking DeFi base can affect altcoin liquidity, governance-token demand, and sentiment around the broader smart-contract economy. Protocols that rely heavily on incentive emissions may find it harder to attract sticky deposits. Stronger platforms, however, may benefit if users consolidate around venues with deeper liquidity, clearer risk controls, and more durable revenue models.

The broader takeaway is that DeFi is not dead, but the market is demanding more discipline. Sustainable yields, transparent risk, and protocol-level revenue matter more when speculative liquidity is no longer lifting every boat.

Market Context

The decline also changes how protocol tokens are valued. In stronger markets, investors often pay up for governance tokens on the assumption that deposits, fees, and future incentives will keep growing. When TVL contracts, that assumption becomes harder to defend, and the market starts separating protocols with real fee demand from those that relied mostly on emissions.

That separation may ultimately be healthy for the sector. A smaller but more durable liquidity base gives serious DeFi teams a cleaner foundation, even if the headline TVL number looks uncomfortable in the short term.

This coverage is based on information from DefiLlama.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/DtcfxPz

Coinbase Open To More Acquisitions After $2.9B Deribit Deal Closes, CEO Says

Coinbase may not be finished shopping after its Deribit acquisition. The exchange’s chief executive has signalled that the company remains open to further deals as it tries to deepen its reach in crypto derivatives and expand beyond its core US spot-trading base.

TL;DR

Coinbase has closed its $2.9 billion Deribit acquisition, strengthening its crypto derivatives footprint.
CEO Brian Armstrong reportedly told Bloomberg TV that the company remains open to additional deals.
The strategy points to a broader push by Coinbase to capture offshore derivatives activity and diversify revenue.

Coinbase Looks Beyond Spot Trading

Coinbase’s Deribit deal gives the company a direct route into one of the most important corners of the crypto market: options and derivatives. Deribit has long been a major venue for Bitcoin and Ether options activity, which makes the acquisition strategically different from a simple user-growth purchase. It gives Coinbase deeper exposure to professional trading flows, volatility products, and institutional hedging demand.

According to the report, Armstrong said Coinbase has a strong balance sheet and remains willing to look at further acquisitions where they make strategic sense. That matters because the largest exchanges are no longer competing only for casual spot traders. They are also competing for liquidity, institutional infrastructure, derivatives volume, custody relationships, and regulatory positioning.

Why Derivatives Matter

Derivatives have become a central part of crypto market structure. Futures, options, and perpetual-style instruments often set the tone for leverage, funding, volatility expectations, and liquidation risk. By buying Deribit, Coinbase is effectively buying a stronger seat at the table where a large part of professional crypto risk is priced.

The move also helps Coinbase reduce reliance on transaction fees from retail spot trading. That revenue can be highly cyclical, rising sharply during bull markets and fading during quieter periods. Derivatives, custody, stablecoin revenue, subscriptions, and institutional services all give Coinbase more ways to generate income across different market conditions.

What Traders Are Watching Next

The key question is whether Coinbase can integrate Deribit while preserving the deep liquidity and specialist user base that made the venue valuable in the first place. Traders will also watch whether the deal helps Coinbase compete more aggressively with offshore venues that have historically dominated derivatives activity.

Further acquisitions could accelerate that shift, but they also bring integration and regulatory risks. Coinbase has spent years presenting itself as a compliance-first exchange. Any new deal will need to fit that posture while still giving the company enough reach to compete globally.

Market Context

The market angle here is not simply that Coinbase has bought another business. It is that regulated exchanges are trying to own more of the professional crypto stack before the next major cycle. Options venues, custody relationships, prime services, and institutional execution are all becoming part of the same competitive map.

That makes future M&A worth watching closely. If Coinbase continues to buy rather than build in specialist areas, it could shorten the time needed to compete with offshore platforms that already dominate derivatives liquidity.

This coverage is based on information from FinanceFeeds and Bloomberg TV.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/UtyLr35

Prediction Market Kalshi Reportedly Seeks New Funding At $40 Billion Valuation

Kalshi is reportedly seeking fresh funding at a valuation of around $40 billion, a striking figure that shows how quickly prediction markets have moved from niche trading venues to one of the most closely watched corners of financial technology.

TL;DR

Kalshi is reportedly in talks to raise capital at a valuation of about $40 billion.
The reported valuation would underline strong investor demand for regulated event-contract platforms.
The funding story lands while prediction markets are also facing major regulatory battles.

A Large Bet On Event Contracts

The reported funding talks suggest investors are treating prediction markets as more than a novelty. Event contracts have become a way to turn public questions into tradable instruments, and platforms that can offer regulated access may be positioned to capture demand from both retail and institutional users.

A $40 billion valuation would be notable in any fintech category. In prediction markets, it would be especially striking because the sector is still being defined in real time. The product-market fit is obvious during high-attention events, but the regulatory structure and long-term revenue model are still evolving.

Why Investors Are Interested

The appeal is simple: prediction markets can turn almost any widely followed outcome into a liquid trading venue. That gives platforms a potentially enormous addressable market, from politics and macro data to corporate events, sports-adjacent markets, and cultural outcomes. The more liquid the market becomes, the more useful it can be as a pricing signal.

For crypto, the category is also important because on-chain users helped normalize prediction-market behavior. Polymarket showed how quickly traders could organize around event outcomes, while Kalshi’s regulated structure gives traditional investors a cleaner compliance story.

Regulatory Risk Is Still The Big Overhang

The timing is important because Kalshi’s valuation story is developing alongside a wider legal fight over prediction markets. The CFTC has been trying to assert federal oversight, while state regulators have raised concerns that some event contracts resemble gambling. That tension could shape how quickly the market expands.

For now, the funding talks show that investors are willing to underwrite the category despite those risks. The market is effectively betting that prediction markets will become a durable part of the financial landscape rather than a temporary speculative trend.

Market Context

The reported valuation also gives the regulatory battle a sharper edge. A company potentially worth tens of billions of dollars has more resources to fight in court, lobby policymakers, and build institutional partnerships. It also gives regulators more reason to define the rules before the market becomes even larger.

That combination of fast capital formation and unresolved legal questions is familiar in crypto. The industry has seen several categories become economically significant before regulators settled on a consistent framework, and prediction markets now appear to be entering that same phase.

That leaves the story as more than a single-day headline. The practical test is whether the development changes user access, liquidity, regulatory confidence, or trader positioning over the next few sessions rather than simply adding another announcement to the crypto news cycle.

This coverage is based on information from Financial Times.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

from NewsBTC https://ift.tt/27ZjUIx